7,491 Pages
(Difference between revisions) | User:DragonEmeperor
(Template Fonts: new section)
Line 723: Line 723:
They automatically do that, I don't even click on those.[[User:Invader Rob II|Invader Rob II]] ([[User talk:Invader Rob II|talk]]) 02:20, September 20, 2018 (UTC)
They automatically do that, I don't even click on those.[[User:Invader Rob II|Invader Rob II]] ([[User talk:Invader Rob II|talk]]) 02:20, September 20, 2018 (UTC)
== Template Fonts ==
Do not revert an edit such as template:PTO unless necessary. Some templates are not legible due to the font color and the background both being dark; would have to change the font color to a bright white to keep a purple background. - {{User:PrinceZarbon/sig}} 18:07, September 22, 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:07, September 22, 2018

Archive 1 2014 - 2018

Dude, WAKE UP!!!!!


I can't tell if he used it against Zamasu. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:27, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

Oh my gosh. 😑😑😑 During their first fight, Goku felt Goku Black's ki in Zamasu. After that, Goku charged at Zamasu with his fist. Zamasu caught Goku's fist as if it was nothing. But as Goku began to push back, with his fist still caught in Zamasu's hand, Zamasu lost his grip and caught Zamasu's attention to Goku's power and was soon defeated. He did the same thing to Beerus. Beerus caught Goku's fist and yet Goku pushed back and that caught Beerus' attention to Goku's power. I mean come on!! Beerus and Zamasu are gods and Goku fought them both as Super Saiyan and Super Saiyan 2 while using God's Crimson Radiance in both fights!! Remember, he made the Super Saiyan God power his own and mastered the form's energy in his Super Saiyan forms!! —This unsigned comment was made by Rey0194 (talkcontribs) Please sign your posts with ~~~~ next time!

Calm down, damn. The anime rarely goes into the specifics of this stuff. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:54, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

That really doesn't prove he used it against Zamasu. That's pure speculation. ExyleCage (talk) 02:07, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

Then tell me why Goku fought gods as a regular Super Saiyan since you think it's pure speculation. Goku lost easily to Beerus cause he didn't have Super Saiyan God power. After losing the Super Saiyan God form , he somehow absorbed its power and still fought Beerus with regular Super Saiyan. After Battle of Gods Arc, he never started out fighting other gods with any god form until later. Rey0194 (User talk:Rey0194)

Here's the thing. You're trying to say that Goku used an ability that is literally inoperable. It automatically works with every form. He can't deactivate it. So saying "Oh. He used it at this point in time." is completely redundant. ExyleCage (talk) 02:48, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

Actually, he can deactivate it. He deactivated it when he fought non-godly characters like Frost. It was even mentioned in the Super Saiyan Blue page that Goku and Vegeta can reactivate their non god-enhanced Super Saiyans. Goku reactivated it when he fought Zamasu. He reactivated it when he fought Goku Black. It was activated during his fight with Beerus. Rey0194 (User talk:Rey0194)

Dragon, there's a reason why Goku started out as Super Saiyan when he fought against Goku Black and Zamasu. If God's Crimson Radiance is not one reason, then tell me why? Rey0194 (User talk:Rey0194)

Not gonna answer my question? Just gonna keep unediting? Rey0194 (User talk:Rey0194)

Screw it. I'm telling Neff to lock the page. ExyleCage (talk) 04:08, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

le god of destruction

Are my minor edits not worthy? Lol is there anything i can do to keep them up. —This unsigned comment was made by Yaboyrell (talkcontribs) Please sign your posts with ~~~~ next time!


Look stop changing all of my edits without giving a actual reason Nikon23 01:03, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

i'm trying to fix the errors and you keep changing my edits. you geting on my nerves. Nikon23 01:14, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

I already did it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:15, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

yeah, but i was trying to do fix it also and you kept conflicting and causing confusion. Nikon23 01:19, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

Because honestly Uub didn't need a tabber since he doesn't have a lot of techniques. But this edit war wasn't gonna end so there you have it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:22, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

from your talk apge, i can see that this is your problem Nikon23 01:19, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

Because you can't add speculation to a page and think its true. But, Rey didn't wanna listen. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:22, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

i don't add speculations, so don't confuse me with other users. im just pointing out that you have alot of complaints, and i can see why. Nikon23 01:33, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

I didn't say you added speculation, I'm talking about Rey0194. As the for complaints, some users add in wrong information and I try correct it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:40, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

and who are you to decide who gets a tabber? Nikon23 01:34, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

Because if you noticed most the of the characters that have them got a lot of techniques and forms. If they don't, they don't really need one. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:40, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

This needs to be addressed.

DragonEmperor.  You need to understand that these repeated actions that you do, that result in these constant complaints to your talk page. Could have repercussions  on both you and the wiki in general. 

The common issue of you reverting other users' edits without leaving a reason in the edit summaries, is going to be very problamatic because if more users continue to complain about your constant actions that results in them coming here. Eventually, the admins will be forced to deal with this.

By continuing to revert other user's edits without leaving an edit summary, is going to be build up as evidence for setting grounds for you to be blocked. Because ultimately: this will hurt the wiki more then helps and the admins will be forced to stop this. 

If users feel that their edits are always being undone without any reason explained in the edit summaries. It will result in either A: They will feel deterred from continuing to edit here and feel that that this wiki is only full of users who will not allow anyone else who edits to keep their input on the articles as well. Thereby damaging this wiki's image. 

B: Constant complaints to your talk page about your repeated controversial actions that will eventually result in admin be forced to deal with it.

If this constant reccuring issue with you builds up with the community constant critiscims of your actions. It will create grounds for you to be blocked from editing on this wiki for a period of time. If that does come to pass. Your efforts of wanting to be an admin here will be sabotaged because being blocked will prevent you being nominated as a canidate for being an admin by the community for a large period of time, even years.

Here are some things i would you like you to do so you can fix this.

1. Leave an explanation in the edit summary of why you reverted another user's edit so that the issue transfers from being about you on this talk page, to about the article's subject on it's talk page  that the community can have a pitch in, if it results in an edit war, the other user will be adviced to talk on the article's talk page, without causing strife to your image as an editor.

2. Try to slow down on the amount of editing you do here daily because not only does it clutter up the recent wiki activity page so users have a harder time finding who else has edited here, if they choose to go and see them and find other activites that are going on in the community as well. It also perverts the image that the wiki is trying to maintain as a  community created and maintained encyclopedia. If there is one editor who is contantly doing everything while not allowing inputs from other editors in without causing strife to them. It will also help you give time to process your thoughts better before deciding to take an action in editing as well.

This isn't an offical warning by the way, it's just advice on how you can deal with these issues that the community constantly comes and be forced to confront about while you are still on good terms with everyone. But the next message from an admin who gets a complaint from the communuty about your actions could result in an offical warning that says you will be blocked should you continue these course of actions. And will result in one if the admin that users complain to about this, is me0551E80Y (talk) 05:06, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

Gonna cut in for a moment here. You literally just told Dragon that, should someone complain about him, he's getting a warning. You didn't even give a proper set of circumstances, instead just saying "If they come to me, I'm gonna do whatever I so please." Keep in mind you did not even bother thinking through the fact that you're now just going to get random complaints all of the time from people who don't like the way he does things. You could argue "common sense", but we live in an era where common sense is non-existant. You literally just opened up the door for anyone and everyone to complain about someone who has a huge passion for Dragon Ball. This is in no way a personal attack on you, either, just in case you thought I was trying to upset you in anyway. I am just trying to inform you that you basically just threatened someone with your administrative power while other admins and bureaucrats have already said it's fine for him to do this as long as he says something along the lines of "take it to the talk page". If they already have an eye out and are letting him do this, then there's no point in threatening him. I ask that you utilize better judgement when choosing to give others warnings or "advice". Remember to also consult the other admins before doing something like this, as you're new to it and could very well have your powers revoked for jumping the gun like you did. Keep in mind, I'm not arguing for him, I am merely trying to express what it seems like you did from my point of view. ExyleCage (talk) 07:46, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

If you take a look at this user's history, he has been repeatedly asked to write edit summaries in his reverts by others as wel including admins. On other wikis he's edited, he has been blocked for that very reason as well. It's causing strife to the community meaning other users. New users come here to edit as well, who are not familar with him such as Nikon above will not see it the way you do all it would take is someone messaging an admin about this and an action will ahve to be taken. It seems you misundsterstood my Advice, It's not a threat. I explained thorughly what his actions are that caused this and how to change it. It's really simple to do. It's been sugggested to him over and over again even from other admins. But patience does eventually run thin if it continues to not be taken into account.

But if he ignores it again and another user comes to my talk page asking me to deal with him. I will issue an offical warning that if he doesn't leave reasons in his edit summaries, and if another compalint comes after that. Then i will block him for a few days to a week.  It's just procedure and repsoniblity of an admin to do. I also watch everything that is going on as well. So i'm well aware of these things.  I am looking out for the Whole wiki not just us admins and him. But the new users as well as ones who have not edited in a long time.

In my opinion, these types of users are vital to keeping this wiki alive and popular, the ones that mean goodwill will make few mistakes in their beginning, every one does, but they are quick to learn and will be adviced as well. They then go on to help bring new additonal life as to help evolve the encylopedia, bringing in their friends as well. But they are also the ones that can be easily scared away by actions from more senior editiors of just reverting everything they do without explanation. This is what concerns me about this wiki in the long run.

This user also wants to be an admin as well and the beuarcrats are well aware of this. He's not there yet because there are some issues still with him such as this. But telling him that if he chooses not to heed the advice to address these concerns can result in much  more then just his ability to not edit being compromised. He is free to do as he wishes, i am not taking that away from him. It's the consequences that follow the choices he make that he will have to confront. Just like us all. I am well aware of what being an admin means and what it can restrict me to do.

As for me. I may not been an admin for very long. But i have been on this wiki for a long time. I have seen worse times for it with the beuarcrats and admins having explosive confrontations with users that disagreed with everything and it resulted in such a rift between the community and the ones in charge. But i notice all the signs that led to those situations can be easily avoided at the beginning and things being handled differently and stronger relationships by adressing  the seeds of those situations that led to that getting out of hand in ways like this. 0551E80Y (talk) 08:21, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

Yes, but regardless of if he gives a reason or not, there WILL be users who bombard you with complaints, simply because they don't like him. The way you explained it, there will be users who see what you said and do some sort of false edits, knowing that Dragon will remove the obvious vandalism. That user will then come to you and complain, knowing fully well that YOU will take that bait, banking on the fact there have been complaints before so you'll just warn or block him. There's no doubt in my mind that you'll eventually be having a bad day, get a complaint, and immediately assume he did it just because he has a history of doing it. It's something that all admins go through eventually. I'm not saying you DON'T know what an admin does, I'm saying you're jumping the gun on what you're doing without thinking about the consequences of what can, and will, eventually happen with a warning such as the one you gave. ExyleCage (talk) 19:20, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

Goku Black edit

Hey there, I'm not complaining or anything, I'm just asking. Why couldn't my image of Zamasu and Black being sliced in half remain there? HygorBohmHubner (talk) 21:40, May 28, 2018 (UTC)

Do you think it was better than better Black gaining Immortality? DragonEmeperor (talk) 21:43, May 28, 2018 (UTC)

Well, I only thought that such a big image instead of a thumbnail-sized one was kinda weird there. It wasn't about his immortality or anything. HygorBohmHubner (talk) 21:45, May 28, 2018 (UTC)

Ohhhhhh, Okay. I'll just switch them back and put it in the gallery then. DragonEmeperor (talk) 21:47, May 28, 2018 (UTC)


There is absolutely no reason to make the logo smaller. Especially this one that's smaller on the eyes and harder to see. Stop undoing my edit.Invader Rob II (talk) 22:32, June 5, 2018 (UTC)

There was no problem with it before. Keep it up, I'll just keep reverting it.--Invader Rob II (talk) 03:43, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Hey, instead of being a taddler how about you just come to this talk page right here and explain to me why you keep undoing the image size like a regular editor would do? Let's have some diplomacy instead of reporting for the dumbest of things.--Invader Rob II (talk) 04:13, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Nothing is wrong the size, your the only one arguing about it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 04:14, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

And you're the one who changed it. It was always 250px. You're the one who keeps making it a problem.--Invader Rob II (talk) 04:15, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

I was editing on the page. But, the moment I changed it, you started acting crazy and wanted to edit war. DragonEmeperor (talk) 04:17, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

If you have a problem with my size, then why do you keep reverting it? Seems like you also want one.--Invader Rob II (talk) 04:18, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Because you also undid my other edits I added to the page besides the size. So what if its smaller, it's not that much of a difference. DragonEmeperor (talk) 04:20, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Expect it's easier to see this specific one? Where was the size problem before my dude?--Invader Rob II (talk) 04:21, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Who actually cares about the logo besides you? Seriously? DragonEmeperor (talk) 04:24, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

You win, brat. You can have your rediculous edit if it makes you feel good. This is a waste of time and we'll just end up being both blocked because of this. And by the look of your edit count, you have much more to lose on this wiki than me.Invader Rob II (talk) 04:23, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Oh yeah, and who cares about the logo besides you? You, of couse. Since you think it's so big you have to keep undoing it.--Invader Rob II (talk) 04:25, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

You know what its done and settled. Get over it since you didn't care anymore. DragonEmeperor (talk) 04:28, June 6, 2018 (UTC)


Why THE HELL did you allow yourself to delete all my work on the OST page ?

It was good as it was! Now it looks like shit. Congratulations.

TovahCat (talk) 12:09, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Just commenting on how you are progressing. It seems that you haven't improved very much based on the above responses since our talk. You need to adheed to my advice more to prevent these issues from happening: Slow down on your editing daily so that other users can have a fair go at contributing as well, leave edit summarires on your reverts of other users edits and when Edit wars happen. Request the other user to use the article's talk page and contact an admin to request to have the article page locked from editing until a consesus is reached on it's talk page. 0551E80Y (talk) 13:19, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

What you saying is complete nonsense! According to you, I'm not going fast enough, however, I did 19 pages in March and DragonEmeperor only modified that in May, so, I gave the others time to understand the model. In second, I am the only one to take care of this section, it is even on my own initiative that I created the page of the OST because it did not exist in the first place! Therefore, I am the only one to contribute so I have the right to create the model I want on this section, and the idea was good enough, to be able to offer listening to the musical theme with an illustration and other stuff. But here he deleted everything, it's just shameful! Why delete everything and even the sources! I can't go back now. All the media I uploaded are gone! A wikia is made in the purpose that everyone does contribute to it so why people who think themselves superior to the others erase all the work done upstream? So now, either you fix this problem, or I will never contribute again because I have other things to do!

TovahCat (talk) 14:14, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

My dude, he was not talking to you, he was talking to Dragon. You need to calm down a bit. Furthermore, threatening an admin isn't gonna get you very far. Not a good idea. You should probably calm down a bit. Just a suggestion. ExyleCage (talk) 14:25, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Yeah what ExyleCage said. I wasn't refferrign to you. If you had read the above posts on this talk page you would have realized that for yourself. Also as Exyle said. Going angry into rants like this isn't gonna help your cause and if you keep acting aggressive and having a venomous attitude about this issue. You will have to be blocked for a while so you can calm down. That attitude is not needed on this wiki. 0551E80Y (talk) 14:41, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Aussie, the music infobox was deleted so I removed it. Don't go jumping to conclusions until you and TovahCat check what happened first. DragonEmeperor (talk) 23:08, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

Look see for yourselves on this page. The template for music was deleted cause it no longer used anymore. DragonEmeperor (talk) 23:11, June 6, 2018 (UTC)

That's fair enough but you probably should have explained that in the edit summary. The lesser experienced Wiki users might not understand and can take it the wrong way as we see here.Bullza (talk) 01:27, June 7, 2018 (UTC)

SSJ3 Pic

why have you removed my edit? —This unsigned comment was made by ImmaGogeta (talkcontribs) Please sign your posts with ~~~~ next time!

I left a message, saying the first pic was fine. DragonEmeperor (talk) 20:33, June 9, 2018 (UTC)

Actually, its my fault on my end. I was thinking of a different pic, so I changed it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 20:35, June 9, 2018 (UTC)

I understand, no worries.ImmaGogeta (talk) 21:48, June 9, 2018 (UTC)

Fused Zamasu and Vegito articles

Hey man, why did you reverse my edits in the Vegito and Fused Zamasu articles? I'm not hating, I'm just asking. I just thought about improving the page with better images and story detail.

HygorBohmHubner (talk) 02:56, June 16, 2018 (UTC)

I fixed them already. DragonEmeperor (talk) 02:58, June 16, 2018 (UTC)

Majin Buu

Please Understand the difference between Majin Buu and Inoccent/Good Buu.
Majin buu the buu who is fused with the bad buu after bad buu leaves him he is good Buu/Innocent Buu—This unsigned comment was made by Saiyanrage7783OP (talkcontribs) Please sign your posts with ~~~~ next time!

They all share the name Majin Buu. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:44, June 20, 2018 (UTC)

Maybe you need to understand the difference, Saiyanrage7783OP. Innocent Buu is not Good Buu. Innocent Buu is after he's absorbed the Daikaioh. Good Buu is after he's separated from Evil Buu.

Orion (T-B-C) 07:51, June 20, 2018 (UTC)

Physical and natural abilities on Broly's page


I'm not sure why you deleted the physical and natural abilities tab under the abilities section of Broly's page. Since you're planning on deleting the List of techniques used by Broly page anyways, I figured that there's no reason the physical and natural abilities can't be noted on his page just as the techniques and transformations tabs. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 20:51, June 20, 2018 (UTC)

Most of that can be listed under his power because it'll make the abilities section too big. DragonEmeperor (talk) 21:25, June 20, 2018 (UTC)

Okay, put it under power, then. Though I had to create a separate section for it due to the inherent difficulties putting it in the main section. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 00:09, June 21, 2018 (UTC)
Ugh, okay, you know what? Since you seem to know how to do this sort of thing far better than I do, how about you just add it in in whatever way you see fit after you deleted my attempt? All I care about is making sure that particular section doesn't get deleted with the other page, which means including it. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 11:35, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Half of that section is already listed under Abilities and the other is mentioned in Power. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:30, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Found the sdbh manga scans in raw

If you'd be interested heres the link FlatZone (talk) 00:25, June 24, 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. DragonEmeperor (talk) 00:29, June 24, 2018 (UTC)

Chapter 11 is there now, has some panels that may be useful. FlatZone (talk) 16:04, June 28, 2018 (UTC)


My trivia addition wasn’t legit? He was quoted by the main character on Blood Lad that he’s “the greatest fighter ever” and tried to imitate his Kamehameha Valorista22 (talk) 21:54, June 24, 2018 (UTC)

It is, but its already listed in the List of influences on popular culture page. DragonEmeperor (talk) 23:36, June 24, 2018 (UTC)

Please explain that in your edit summary next time and for reverting other users work. Thank you. 0551E80Y (talk) 04:47, June 25, 2018 (UTC)

Stop it.

Seriously, your editing is starting to get on my nerves. Please stop it and leave it be or else I'll have to report you.Rogeta234 (talk) 03:12, July 5, 2018 (UTC)

You already did. Plus, your the one removing stuff that's been said in the sub version. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:13, July 5, 2018 (UTC)

You should've put in the fact it was in the sub version from the start. This all could've been avoided.Rogeta234 (talk) 03:14, July 5, 2018 (UTC)

You should already know from watching the subbed version. I'm sure you watched it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:19, July 5, 2018 (UTC)

I've only heard from it. But you should've added that detail in from the getgo.Rogeta234 (talk) 03:20, July 5, 2018 (UTC)

Rogeta, considering the fact there is no rule that says one HAS to explain an edit reversal, you're the one in the wrong. There is no rule that says he has to and any admin who chooses to give him a "warning" would be going against the rules of the wiki. If you are angry about this, report to a beaurocrat that the rules need changed. But fair warning; less people would choose to do edits if it became mandatory to explain an edit reversal. ExyleCage (talk) 15:31, July 5, 2018 (UTC)

That's good advice, but you're not really one to pull rank on me. I've been on here longer and know the rules better than you. DragonEmperor is the one in the wrong for not clarifying it from the start.Rogeta234 (talk) 16:42, July 5, 2018 (UTC)


Care to explain to me why my trivial edit comparing Goku Black with Blackfire was reversed? ChocolateElemental (talk) 08:44, July 5, 2018 (UTC)

Comparison trivia had been removed or condensed on a lot of pages. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:03, July 5, 2018 (UTC)

Re: Enough

So what if I haven't edited here in two years? You're not even close to being an admin nor at a moderator either. In what world do you think you can do what you please? Just because you deleted some information I added you apparently deem worthless? Unless you're an mod of any kind you don't get to call the shots either, quit trying to fight me over this. ThunderBeam707 (talk) 7-6-18 (UTC)


It's pretty simple actually, you'll just need a program to perform edits automatically. The program I use is AutoWikiBrowser, so you can download that (if you're on a Mac, you'll also need CrossOver to install it). A ten-minute tutorial like this can help explain the interface, and then you'll be able to stuff like:

  • Find/replace text across the entire wiki, or portions of the wiki.
  • Automatically detect typos and correct them with high accuracy, across the entire wiki.

Pretty powerful stuff. The tutorial doesn't mention the find/replace feature, but it's pretty easy to figure out.

A few notes:

  • Most wikis let you use the program right away. However, some wikis (like this one) require you get permission to use the bot; otherwise, the program will notify you that you need permission first. You've already asked Dragon Ball Wiki talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage, so you might be ready.
  • Your edits will show up in Wiki Activity. If you want to avoid cluttering that page, create another account and ask the Wikia staff to give it the "Bot" flag (more info here). Edits from a bot account will no longer show up in Wiki Activity (though they will show up in Recent Changes, if you check "Show Bots"), so you can log into AutoWikiBrowser with it and your edits won't be disruptive. Mine is named User:PiesBot, but the name is arbitrary.

Tell me if you need any help. ~~ IST O L E T H E P I ES π 22:28, July 7, 2018 (UTC)

I have several regular expressions (Regex) that can fix certain common issues. If you need anything, let me know.

Orion (T-B-C) 22:38, July 7, 2018 (UTC)

You're jumping the gun

Just because Broly is appearing in canon, doesn't make Super Saiyan Berserk retconned. I'm going to be moving the pages back.Invader Rob II (talk) 01:44, July 10, 2018 (UTC)

That's just a redirect, not a page anymore. And don't move anything yet because we have no idea what's gonna happen yet. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:46, July 10, 2018 (UTC)


Why are you putting all those redirects up for deletion?--Neffyarious (talk) 10:42, July 10, 2018 (UTC)

Most of them are misspelled, have kanji title, and I was trying to remove the unnecessary ones. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:23, July 10, 2018 (UTC)

"Read the category first before removing."

You are the one who didn't read. I quote: "This is a list of characters who only appeared in any of the films." —This unsigned comment was made by Yaronos (talkcontribs) Please sign your posts with ~~~~ next time!

The majority didn't only appear in films. DragonEmeperor (talk) 21:08, July 11, 2018 (UTC)


But this is what the category said (it's now correct). Also, why are you keep marking my redirect to deletion?Yaronos (talk) 21:11, July 11, 2018 (UTC)

Because its an incorrect name. DragonEmeperor (talk) 21:27, July 11, 2018 (UTC)

How do you know which DBZ movies take place in the main timeline?

Can I have some kind of website source on this? Not to prove a point, but just because I'm really curious where this info comes from if true.Invader Rob II (talk) 21:13, July 11, 2018 (UTC)

Ask Neff. All I know is that most of it comes from daizenshuu. DragonEmeperor (talk) 21:27, July 11, 2018 (UTC)

Bojack Unbound

Why did you remove Bojack Unbound? Deadzone and Cooler's Revenge were kept because they accurately fit with the main timeline, as did Bojack Unbound.--Steveo920 (talk) 05:53, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

But, it was already decided to include it in the parallel world. DragonEmeperor (talk) 05:55, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

That still doesn't explain why you kept Deadzone and Cooler's Revenge. Bojack Unbound fits in canonly like the other two movies without any timeline holes to be right after the Cell Saga but before the Buu saga without ruining anything.--Steveo920 (talk) 06:01, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

Cause Cooler and Garlic Jr appeared in the anime. If you want more info ask Neff cause that's the reason he told me. 06:03, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

Just gonna point out that Deadzone does NOT fit into any part of the timeline, as Krillin and Piccolo had not met Gohan until literally the day Raditz appeared. As stated numerous times. But, if you wanna keep the innacuracy, go ahead.ExyleCage (talk) 06:14, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

Go to Neff's talk page. He's the one who established those terms for parallel continuity.--Invader Rob II (talk) 06:15, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

That troll

You do know that troll, can easily make another account? Reporting them won't do a single thing. (Kaleifla 03:00, July 13, 2018 (UTC))

If he do, I'll have him block across all fandom like the last troll who kept making accounts. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:02, July 13, 2018 (UTC)

Still won't fix the problems, with a simple IP switch, they can simply come back and the problems continue. (Kaleifla 03:08, July 13, 2018 (UTC))

AlejandBobadilla and socks didn't come back after being blocked across fandom, so SilverKaiser won't. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:10, July 13, 2018 (UTC)

Movie Canon

Hi DragonEmeperor. Well, in Xenoverse 2, Goku from main timeline does seem recognize Broly from the parallel universe. I can create Goku in Dragon Ball Fanon Wiki which is why my OC and Goku see the movie villains from the main timeline, you see this is my Goku character that I created. Did you like it? --Zekons (talk) 04:49, July 13, 2018 (UTC)

That comment Goku said was before that they decided to reboot Broly. DragonEmeperor (talk) 04:59, July 13, 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I know Emeperor. Thanks for telling me about parallel universe. ^-^ Zekons (talk) 07:27, July 13, 2018 (UTC)


Please do not create articles for your so-called “parallel” characters. See the MoS to contribute to the ongoing discussion. -- SSJ4 Goku(2) 04:38, July 15, 2018 (UTC)

Dragon Ball GT, XENO and ONLINE takes place in alternate realities

Hey why did you remove my edits? I had a lot of work fixing/editing them, The Dragon Ball GT, Xeno and Online series doesn't takes place in the main timeline therefore they are alternate realities/timelines. Tesshu (talk) 04:39, July 15, 2018 (UTC)

They are not part of that dimension, see the discussions first or talk to an admin. DragonEmeperor (talk) 04:45, July 15, 2018 (UTC)

Oh well at least i tryed to fix it. Tesshu (talk)

This is exactly the probably with these head-canon based parallel articles. Everyone has their own idea and this is already causing chaotic edits and reader confusion. -- SSJ4 Goku(2) 04:50, July 15, 2018 (UTC)
This isn't headcanon most people considers GT to be non-canon besides Toryiama stated that GT is an "grand side story" and Christopher Sabat sayd  GT Isn't canon anymore also Xenoverse and Online are alternate realities, they aren't part of the main canon. Tesshu (talk) 04:54, July 15, 2018 (UTC)
I'm not trying to start edit-war with you but you should at least consider what i edited, they aren't vandalism or poor editions. Tesshu (talk) 05:08, July 15, 2018 (UTC)

Side story does not mean non-canon. It means side story. Chris Sabat is an American voice actor, not a creator or controller of original DB content. In any case, if you personally choose to consider GT non-canon, hey that’s great just leave it off the site. If DB ever gets an officially managed canon, we would add it to the site. But us trying to decide which contradictory events occur in various sets of alternate realities with really no official guidance is simply unacceptable. -- SSJ4 Goku(2) 15:05, July 15, 2018 (UTC)

Allright just leave it at that,i don't want to star an edit-war and i understand your point of view on this matter. Tesshu (talk) 17:31, July 15, 2018 (UTC)

Thank You!

For getting that Broly page locked, I was gonna ask but you got it done.(Kaleifla 20:19, July 15, 2018 (UTC))

No problem. DragonEmeperor (talk) 20:21, July 15, 2018 (UTC)

Whadda ya know.

Looks like I was right all along with SSJ Berserk being in the 2nd SDBH episode, as expected. So, I pretty much have to say I told you so.Rogeta234 (talk) 17:39, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

I never said you was wrong, I just wanted to wait for the episode. So stop acting childish for once. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:17, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

It was not about being childish, it was about being logical. Since Berserk was in the title, it made perfect sense the form would appear.Rogeta234 (talk) 18:28, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

I just said you wasn't wrong, but I made my choice. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:30, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

Just don't do it again when it's really obvious.Rogeta234 (talk) 18:31, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

Just wait for the episode then. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:39, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

Or just look at the title and use logic next time.Rogeta234 (talk) 18:40, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

We didn't do for Super, so why do it now. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:43, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

I don't see a problem with adding this info in, since we know it is in the episode. --Neffyarious (talk) 18:45, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

Alright. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:46, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

Fusion Kids

You say that you never list future kids on fusions but that still doesn't mean they're not the fusion's child if that's the case Future Trunks shouldn't be listed as Vegeta's son also why are you undoing all my other edits? (XIII13Hero (talk) 20:25, July 20, 2018 (UTC))

I said only the fusion characters because overloads the infobox. DragonEmeperor (talk) 20:28, July 20, 2018 (UTC)


Hi, I'm very sorry. I didn't mean to Broly has a different person. :( Zekons (talk) 01:04, July 21, 2018 (UTC)

Supreme Kai

Who is the first person to be promoted to Supreme Kai ? I ask that because I don't know who the first person is and that's why I edited the Trivia. --Mgdodl (talk) 20:46, July 22, 2018 (UTC)

Chronoa, the Supreme Kai of Time of Universe 7. DragonEmeperor (talk) 21:35, July 22, 2018 (UTC)
That's neither confirmed nor true... ExyleCage (talk) 03:04, July 23, 2018 (UTC)
Read her background and it says she was a regular Kai who became a Supreme Kai sometime after her battle against Demigra. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:12, July 23, 2018 (UTC)
But that doesn't mean she was the first. ExyleCage (talk) 03:27, July 23, 2018 (UTC)
If were counting that Xenoverse was released before Zamasu's debut, then yeah she was. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:30, July 23, 2018 (UTC)
That's not how that works, my dude. She's slightly younger than Elder Kai who was ALSO a Supreme Kai before he was imprisoned. Using the logic you are, we could claim that HE was the first Supreme Kai. ExyleCage (talk) 03:39, July 23, 2018 (UTC)
Or, we could just say he was only known Kai shown to be promoted. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:46, July 23, 2018 (UTC)

Either way, nothing even remotely indicates that Chronoa was the first Supreme Kai. There's no official material stating it nor is there any official material even remotely implying it. ExyleCage (talk) 11:08, July 23, 2018 (UTC)

You Told Dragon You Blocked This Dude

But, it says you didn't. But, it says you didn't. ExyleCage (talk) 05:00, July 24, 2018 (UTC)

Well, Dragon, I accidently made this category on your page and not FinalChidori's. Whoopsy doodle. ExyleCage (talk) 05:41, July 24, 2018 (UTC)

Gogeta and Vegito

Hi, I'm just wondering why you delete my edit on Vegito: Xeno and Gogeta: Xeno? I know it was not much but I just added those "backround" information as suggestion, not a statement, because it could have happen. I did say in my edit it was a possibility that the events happen. I also see other pages, where its implied that events happen, but it was NOT conformed that it did happen, and they get to stay up. I just want to know, how I'll know that my stuff gets to stay up, or if it will get deleted.

Because we have no idea how Goku: Xeno and Vegeta: Xeno's backgrounds played out. DragonEmeperor (talk) 06:05, July 24, 2018 (UTC)

Goku Black Attack

I think that in Goku Black's article there is no mention of this technique that appeared in the manga (chapter 21)

Tagoma 4. Reference

Can you correct a mistake on the 4. Reference among Reference ? --Mgdodl (talk) 15:34, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

Super Dragon Ball Heroes manga

Why do you keep removing the manga version from the battle section? I've seen the manga version of battling Kanba.--Steveo920 (talk) 20:09, July 28, 2018 (UTC)

  • Sorry, never mind. I should have looked lower before jumping to conclusions.--Steveo920 (talk) 20:16, July 28, 2018 (UTC)

Deleting Quotes

I recently added two quotes to Katopesla's biography, but you deleted them. I want to know why you deleted them. Thanks. EH28 (talk) 03:20, July 30, 2018 (UTC)

I didn't. Tiger2025 did, so I reverted it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:22, July 30, 2018 (UTC)

Oops, your right, my bad. I'm sorry. EH28 (talk) 03:24, July 30, 2018 (UTC)

Rage Mode

Why did you remove my edits to Rage Mode? Both Gohan and Super Buu have shown extreme boosts of power when enraged.--Steveo920 (talk) 00:09, August 2, 2018 (UTC)

We don't know if they used Rage Mode. DragonEmeperor (talk) 00:22, August 2, 2018 (UTC)

Then the same could be said for Frieza, Vegeta, and Broly than as only the Gods of Destruction show identical Rage Modes. The point of this power is a power boost so intense from one's rage.--Steveo920 (talk) 02:02, August 2, 2018 (UTC)

Vegeta's Quake of Fury was merged to Rage Mode. Frieza was shown using it in his golden form. Broly has references connecting his yellow eyes to the form. DragonEmeperor (talk) 02:05, August 2, 2018 (UTC)

It's just like Uub using Pure Progress, we just don't know.Rogeta234 (talk) 00:23, August 2, 2018 (UTC)

I'm personally puzzled that when Goku Black told Goku that he murdered Him, Chichi and Goten from another timeline after stealing his body. Ssj Blue Goku's power increased from the rage he felt from hearing that, that allowed him to over black and Future Zamasu for a brief period. Does that count as Rage Mode? 0551E80Y (talk) 02:33, August 2, 2018 (UTC)

Only people who have explicitly been stated to use Rage Mode should go on the page (Beerus/Vegeta/Frieza/Broly), the page is not just for anytime someone got angry. --Neffyarious (talk) 11:31, August 2, 2018 (UTC)


It's fine to put up unofficial terms that are being used as redirects for deletion, but things like Boo and Buu are official terms and thus there is no need to delete them. --Neffyarious (talk) 11:36, August 3, 2018 (UTC)

You Don't Own The Wiki

Was it REALLY necessary to go through and undo every single edit I made yesterday? Especially without even leaving a single reason as to why. You are trying to control this Wiki when it's not yours to control. You don't have to check every single edit that gets made here and undo them, and you don't get to decide to all of a sudden try to delete 11 year old redirects. You're not even an admin here... BlackDragon 16:42, August 3, 2018 (UTC)

You don't own the wiki either, and you'd do well to read the rules. If your edit is disputed, you need to go to the talk page and explain why you think it should be kept, while keeping the page as it was before your disputed edit. Furthermore, marking for deletion is just that - marking for deletion. It's up to the admins whether or not it gets deleted. It's a suggestion, nothing more.

Orion (T-B-C) 17:12, August 3, 2018 (UTC)

I never said I owned the Wiki, but undoing EVERY single edit I made seems like DragonEmeperor doesn't get the concept. He even undid my minor edits, where I corrected some spelling or grammar mistake. I'm not going to the talk page to discuss where a comma should go. I've been here for years, I don't need to read any rules. BlackDragon 17:52, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
He is blindly reverting every edit I (and others) make, without explanation. If that isn't the definition of trying to control the Wiki I don't know what is. This is a Wiki and everyone is free to edit it. Not just whatever DragonEmeperor wants. BlackDragon 17:55, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
If your edits are being reverted, it's your job to go and explain why they should stay. That's how the rules work. Stop playing the victim card and follow the rules.
Orion (T-B-C) 18:02, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
It's because some of your edits were wrong that's why. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:05, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
DragonEmeperor, you undid EVERY edit I made. Not "some". I'm not playing the victim, I would appreciate it if people other than Emeperor could edit on this Wiki. And if I am wrong, then why dont you bother giving me an explanation in the summary? Then I could read it and understand why it was reverted. But when I added a comma to something like "and this happene but..." and Emeperor undos my edit I am not taking it to the talk page. BlackDragon 18:09, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
If you don't take it to the talk page, I will report you for edit warring and not following the rules. It's your choice at this point whether or not to follow the rules.
Orion (T-B-C) 18:10, August 3, 2018 (UTC)

I am following the rules. This message was not to you Orion. I would appreciate being able to talk to Emeperor. BlackDragon 18:12, August 3, 2018 (UTC)

I fixed those while undoing and some of your other edits were wrong cause they were sourced like Eis Shenron's spawning. He has two different sources for that. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:13, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
You are not following the rules. The rules say that a disputed edit must be discussed in the talk page of the article in question, while keeping the article as it was before the disputed edit. You're causing an edit war, plain and simple. Also, you're talking to him just fine, but I, for one, get sick and tired of people like you coming here and accusing DragonEmeperor of breaking the rules or whatever, when you yourselves are the ones doing so.
Orion (T-B-C) 18:15, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
Why was it necessary to undo this edit? I added a very much needed comma. And all of my edits like this were reverted. I fixed grammar on like 5-6 pages and you undid them all. All I am asking is please give an explanation for why someones edit is wrong. Had you told me there were 2 sources for Eis Shenron I never would have tried to redo the edit. Instead it looked more like you undoing my edit for the sake of undoing every edit I've made since yesterday. BlackDragon 18:18, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
Because you undid everything that was about Turles even though that was sourced. Neff and I even told you the reason, but what you do just erased your talk page to dodge trouble. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:23, August 3, 2018 (UTC)

Also, never change a message on somebody else's talk page. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:25, August 3, 2018 (UTC)

Me changing the fact that Turles and Goku are NOT brothers is not valid reason for you to monitor me and undo every edit I have ever made. I removed it because I don't want to debate using faulty "sources" to make an incorrect claim and because I have no desire to edit Turles. Not to avoid 'trouble'. I haven't changed your message, so you can stop being paranoid.
I'm honestly done with editing on this wiki. I just wanted to try to help, but when every edit you make is immediately reverted by DragonEmeperor it kind of makes you not want to. Especially when you aren't given a valid reason as to why me fixing grammar had to be reverted. BlackDragon 18:54, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
First, you did change a message but I put it back. Second, I told you when I undid your I put your corrections back. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:57, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
I didn't, but whatever. Then why was it so necessary for you to revert my edit? Do you not know that there is an edit button up top that allows you to make an edit, while keeping everyone else's edits intact? You have not given me a valid reason for it other than you wanting to control everything. The grammar has nothing to do with Turles. BlackDragon 19:01, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
You actually did. See here: You replaced my message with your own.
Orion (T-B-C) 19:05, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
People can't give a reason for every little edit they do and what you did with Turles was almost vandalism because it was sourced. I'm not trying to control everything but I won't let vandals ruin pages for kicks. DragonEmeperor (talk) 19:08, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
I'm not a vandal. I've been here for 7 years. I just don't like people purposely misleading others by trying to make Turles Goku's brother over some source that got it wrong, when time and time again it's been said that they are not related.
And sure, you don't need to give a reason for every edit, but you didn't give a single reason on any of them. You were basically not allowing me to edit, as even me correcting grammar mistakes was reverted. That is literally the definition of controlling. As soon as anyone edits a page, you always edit it after them. Not just yesterday. And you kept marking redirects for deletion, even after you were told not to by an admin, and I was trying to stop your (what I consider) vandalism. I'm literally just trying to help because I've been in love with Dragon Ball since I was 5, but the editors behind this community are kind of awful in my opinion and it's just not worth it. BlackDragon 21:14, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
That's how I feel about Dragon Ball. Plus, the source about Turles is from kanzenshuu and some of the redirects were weren't official, so I'm having them deleted like the ones in kanji or misspelled ones. DragonEmeperor (talk) 21:45, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
To be honest, it just made me feel like I'm not welcomed into this community (even though I've been editing off-and-on for 7 years). It also wouldn't be the first time an official source has ever gotten something wrong. Not related, but I've seen official Pokemon guides that have said normal Pokemon were legendary. This is obviously not true, and when I've seen many official sources say Goku and Turles are not related I feel the need to change it. So I did. But you don't have to worry about it anymore because I think I'm done with editing in this community. BlackDragon 21:59, August 3, 2018 (UTC)
Everyone who follows the rules is welcome here. Dragon I would suggest being careful when undoing any edits if he says some were just a spelling or grammar fix. Otherwise it needs to be explained why they are being undone so that people know where the issue is. This is especially true when it comes to new and infrequent users because it'll just put them off returning and give them a bad impression forever.Bullza (talk) 15:08, August 4, 2018 (UTC)

Why do you keep removing Cell Jr. From Raging Blast 2?

At least give a reason! Have you even heard of this game? Here is a proof! Stop removing things without reasons!Yaronos (talk) 09:38, August 6, 2018 (UTC)

I forgot to put him back. Calm down. DragonEmeperor (talk) 16:55, August 6, 2018 (UTC)


Why do you keep reverting the incorrect information about Turles' relation to Goku when the sole conflicting source (a third party magazine at that) you keep citing is contradicted by a direct source a year later and has never been mentioned again. And on top of that, you're not even providing an explanation. This is getting very absurd and by inistently jumbling together both things you're making things confusing for no reason.Jjgp1112 (talk) 13:43, August 8, 2018 (UTC)

Better question: why are you removing sourced information and starting an edit war?

Orion (T-B-C) 13:51, August 8, 2018 (UTC)

Because the "soruced" information is being improperly presented AND contradicted in the same article. This lone source is contradicted by 1) The movie itself. 2) Several sources that both precede AND come after the V-Jump article. I refuse to believe every mod on here can be this obtuse. —This unsigned comment was made by Jjgp1112 (talkcontribs) Please sign your posts with ~~~~ next time!

Goku's Power

Look man, not to be a douche or anything but I honestly don't get why you keep removing my edits on Goku's power section, wchich are small and entirely factual. If you really feel the page is too large you could just cut out sections in the Super section or cut down the movie section. I would understand this little edit war we are having if I put false information or stuff like that on the page but since everything I wrote there matches up with what happens or is said in the anime/manga itself it honestly just makes you come off like you feel you own the page. Since I'm sure that is not your intent, I am going to politely ask that you let me put my old edits in place again. If not, I would like to take this to the pages discussion page. 17:06, August 9, 2018 (UTC) CoolerThanFrieza

Thanks, But Could I get a notification of why my stuff gets changed?

Thanks for fixing my dumb edits, but I do want to do better in the future, so if possible could you send a notification to me explaining what was wrong with what I posted? If not I understand, You make so many edits to this wiki after all...

Furthermore, I posted a few extra songs onto the list of music that were missing... major ones. I'm not completely sure where all of them should go on said page but I'm certain they should be there. Also not sure where songs such as Wolf Hurricane and Ookami should go on that page. If they are wrong could you move them? Hikari no WILLPOWER doesn't even have a page, and I think that is a pretty major track. Maybe I'm wrong, and I do see a lot of arguing in your talk page, in fact people complaining about you not responding, but I will hold my judgement of you, as all the changes you made to my edits thus far have been completely fair.

DeletedTheEngie (talk) 18:32, August 10, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

You need to word out your information better when you add it like Kaioken for example. You could also ask other users including the admin for help as well when your stuck. DragonEmeperor (talk) 20:25, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Frieza Edits

Why do you keep reverting my edits on Frieza's page and others? I replaced pictures with higher quality images.

beadtmdc (talk) 19:40, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

I know but we have so many duplicate pics under other names. DragonEmeperor (talk) 20:02, August 10, 2018 (UTC)

Thanks and also...

I see that the things I added to the music page were removed. I’m not sure where those songs would go, however, or are they not noteworthy enough to have on that page? You aren’t an admin, but you have over 30,000 k edits and I’ve never been able to get the admins attention, so thanks for taking the time to respond. I’ll try to word things more in line with the rest of the article.

DeletedTheEngie (talk) 00:18, August 11, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

You can leave a message on their talk page. They usually respond as soon as they see it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 00:29, August 11, 2018 (UTC)

Saiyan Tail

Hey Dragon Emperor, I just want to know why you deleted my edit concerning Cabba’s knowledge of the Saiyan tail. In the DBS anime, episode 32, when Cabba first meets Goku and Vegeta,  Goku asked him where his tail was when Cabba wasn’t sure what Goku meant by that meanwhile in the manga, chapter 7, Cabba had knowledge of the Saiyan tail and how the Saiyans in his universe evolved past it so isn’t that considered an anime and manga difference. If there’s anyway you can come to any agreement with this can you please accept my edit. Thank you (Sosuagwu17)

The anime had two different versions due the Japanese version and Funimation dub. DragonEmeperor (talk) 20:19, August 12, 2018 (UTC)

Actually, my bad. I just watched both versions again and you were right. DragonEmeperor (talk) 20:28, August 12, 2018 (UTC)

It’s all good. Thank you for understanding and FYI it was not chapter 7 I meant chapter 8. (Sosuagwu17)

Cards Super Dragon Ball Heroes

Hey DragonEmeperor look at this image of the Super Dragon Ball Heroes cards for you to put on the Dragon Ball Wikia please is there on site: BabyKratosxZeus (talk) 19:20, August 13, 2018 (UTC)

Which card? DragonEmeperor (talk) 19:22, August 13, 2018 (UTC)

How about putting Female Saiyan avatars card please! BabyKratosxZeus (talk) 19:30, August 13, 2018 (UTC)

already saw the link

he had no sparks and his hair wasnt as sharp and jagged as when he uses SS2 QuakingStar (talk) 04:35, August 14, 2018 (UTC)


So again we run into the same problem where a "newbie" editor has made an edit here in this case to the "List of Dragon Ball Music" and you've gone and undone his edit without any explanation as to why leading him to wonder what he's done wrong. You have to explain to these people why you're undoing the work that they've put in or they just won't bother again.

As far as I can tell, not being that familiar with the music, he simply added in some missing tracks. Was there a reason you removed them? Apparently there's more songs that aren't listed on that page.Bullza (talk) 18:43, August 14, 2018 (UTC)

I wasn't sure for two of them, but I told him he did noting wrong. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:48, August 14, 2018 (UTC)

Don't worry man, I'm not flaming at you, I just was confused. I'm not mad or anything. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 19:09, August 14, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

Gintama 2 Live Action

Hello, may I know why did you undo my edit for your entry in Goku's & Krillin's page about their Gintama 2 parody appearance? I'm just trying to write the correct information. I know in the trailer, they wrote Goku's & Krillin's name on screen, but in reality, that character is just a parody of Goku and his name is Kobayashi while the other one is Grillin, a parody of Krillin. The one that looks like Freeza is also not him but a parody of him named Breeza. All of them appears in Gintama anime episode 119. Besides that, the trailer is not the trailer for Gintama 2 but it is the trailer for special 3 episodes web-drama by dTV that will be released to promote Gintama 2 movie.

DetektifKonon (talk) 03:22, August 15, 2018 (UTC)

You keep destroying Goku's infobox and I don't know if Frieza is even gonna be in the movie. Plus, talk to Neff cause he added that info. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:27, August 15, 2018 (UTC)

Oh, if that's the case, then I'm okay with it. Maybe I edit it wrongly somehow for Goku's page. I'll try to do it right next time. If that live-action web-drama follows 100% like it's anime counterpart, then a parody of Goku, Krillin, Frieza, Cell, Dende, Shenron, Saibamen and some Namekian will make their appearance but all of them will have their own name. DetektifKonon (talk) 03:42, August 15, 2018 (UTC)


This song doesn't have a page, and it should, but I can't even begin to understand how to format it like the other pages with official lyrics and such. I told Bullza, but I figured since you are so active anyways, you might be willing to format something like that. 

DeletedTheEngie (talk) 16:48, August 15, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

Father Son Kamehameha

Your very annoying.I just put a edit in the Father-Son Kamehameha,and you just delete it.It's not funny.

I spent a lot of time and effort just to make that. —This unsigned comment was made by TheSSJG (talkcontribs) Please sign your posts with ~~~~ next time!

That technique was never used in the ToP. Goku has to be dead for it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 22:30, August 16, 2018 (UTC)

Where's the source that says Goku has to be dead? But I agree that the Father-Son Kamehameha wasn't used; that just so happen to use Kamehameha at the same time at different enemies as sort of a nod to the Father-Son Kamehameha, but not the actual technique. --Made up Character Wiki/Dragon Ball Fanon Wiki Admin Jack Jackson Things I do [mod] 01:43, August 19, 2018 (UTC)

Yo heads up

I made a page, don't delete it, bullza said he would clean it up for me. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 17:39, August 17, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

Perfect Super Saiyan Blue

Buddy, please, you have got to stop this. Perfected Super Saiyan Blue is "MANGA ONLY". Neither Goku nor Vegeta are using this form against Broly because this is in an animated movie. The writers themselves said that PSSB is not in the anime and until they say otherwise, it is not happening in the movie. If you really have other proof, then please show me why you are so stubborn in keeping this wrong piece of information. —This unsigned comment was made by Steve920 (talkcontribs) Please sign your posts with ~~~~ next time!

Steve, that picture is art drawn by Toyataro and its promoting the movie. I never said PSSJ will be in the film. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:27, August 18, 2018 (UTC)

Broly Images

Can you explain why you keep undoing my edits and removing the higher resolution images? MasterChefX (talk) 03:38, August 18, 2018 (UTC)

I took your pics and uploaded them under the ones that are already being used. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:44, August 18, 2018 (UTC)

Super Saiyan God.

Get it through your head. He didn't fight evil Saiyans until he became a SSJG, not a SSJ. Also, his spirit appeared when Goku transformed into a SSJG. That doesn't mean he actually fought Beerus. So stop this editing, it's making you look childish.Rogeta234 (talk) 02:17, August 23, 2018 (UTC)

Please Don't

I made a new page, I'm waiting for Bullza to approve it, don't delete it for me, k? DeletedTheEngie (talk) 17:06, August 24, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

I will say I was having trouble with the format, if you could find some images of the things listed, I would be very thankful. It looks pretty bland right now. I was having issues uploading images.

The mechanics are on the main fighterZ page, however, they are not explained in nearly enough detail. The amount of naunce that these techniques have requires a full page. I'm not looking for a summary, I'm looking for an in depth analysis of each mechanic. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 17:20, August 24, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

The other games didn't need a page for their mechanics. DragonEmeperor (talk) 17:24, August 24, 2018 (UTC)

To be honest, I think they should all have a page. We don't even have a FighterZ wikia. Yet Dokkan Battle gets one. I will legit go and make a page like this for every major dragon ball title if I need to convince you. If it doesn't go on that new page, it absolutely should go someplace on the wiki. Putting the amount of detail I went into all under the gameplay section on the main FighterZ page would be messy. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 17:27, August 24, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

Hell, the main page doesn't even explain the abilities hardly at all. For the most part it just says that they exist. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 17:37, August 24, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

Why don't you create the FighterZ wikia then. That way other people could help you create pages and other stuff on it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:23, August 24, 2018 (UTC)

Good Lord I wish. I can only barely use the basic editing tools, I don't even know if I could begin to figure out how to format a fighterZ wikia. Do you know anybody that might be interested? Also, I'm sorry if I'm coming off as rude, I just was a bit miffed since I worked for quite a while on that. But I'm over it. I understand your argument, but if you truly think that the information on there is not worth noting, then delete it. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 18:47, August 24, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

I've made my case, I won't argue further. I just feel that it is somewhat relevant because my paragraph detailing basic movement is longer than the majority of the entire main page's descriptions for all the universal mechanics combined.

Also damn dude get some rest you are like a machine gun edit machine —This unsigned comment was made by DeletedTheEngie (talkcontribs) Please sign your posts with ~~~~ next time!

@DeletedtheEngie I have just created the FighterZ wiki. I could need some editors to help it grow. Spread the word. Here is a link: Tiger2025 (talk) 00:06, August 25, 2018 (UTC)

What the actual Hell

You reversed my entire edit for the Yamcha page on the fighterZ wiki. I had so much information that you just ripped for no reason. I changed it back. Don't try to undo my edit again. I spent 2 hours writing down all the relevant information for all the moves. If you have an actual complaint about what I put down, please tell me, because I am 100% sure that you are deleting my work for no reason. You might be able to get away with it on this wiki, don't try it on the wiki I asked for.

DeletedTheEngie (talk) 18:57, August 25, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

I am trying my damndest to tolerate you, unlike most people who just flame you, but this latest insult is kinda going too far for me to ignore. Especially when I can't even edit a completely different wiki without you being there to destroy my work DeletedTheEngie (talk) 19:09, August 25, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

Aight It looks like I jumped the gun, you put all the moves on their own pages, but, you did still revert some changes that didn't need to be fixed. The alternate names are there just for jokes, if Lord Yamcha can stay then what I can put in there can stay too. Shouldn't have gotten so angry, but dang. I don't know how much you play FighterZ, but even the breakdowns I did of the moves were summaries. They should stay on Yamcha's main page. The actual move pages need frame data, projectile speed data, property data, and a whole hell of a lot more explanation. There is so much that needs to go into one page for one move. Sorry man. Shouldn't have flipped out. Just lost my mind kind of. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 19:21, August 25, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

You can have your way for now, you can delete the alternate names if it bugs you that much, although if thats the case I don't know why you won't delete Lord Yamcha, but I still feel that the moves need a much more in depth analysis. Those summaries should stay on his page. At least we have a beast like you willing to help out with the Wiki though. Ya know, since you don't sleep. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 19:29, August 25, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie


Oh friends, hopes that Dimps Corporation and Bandai appear to announce the Pan: Xeno in the future of Super Dragon Ball Heroes next year when the Chronoa come back. BabyKratosxZeus (talk) 01:03, August 26, 2018 (UTC)

Goku's Page

Hey Dragonemeperor this is sosuagwu17 once again. I don't know but I think somebody must of vandalized Goku's page. when I went in there it had a lot of stuff that was already in the info box on the intro of the page. I wanted to fix it but it wouldn't allow me to make any edits because it was blocked from editing. If there's any way you can fix it or edit it out for me I'd really appreciate that a lot. link to page Goku. (Sosuagwu17 (talk) 00:49, August 28, 2018 (UTC)).

Never mind I fixed the issue but if there's anything wrong I did with the edit please fix it. Thank you (Sosuagwu17 (talk) 02:54, August 28, 2018 (UTC))

Anime vs Manga

I'm a bit confused as to why the revisions I did spliting up some of Super's characters were reversed when it's clear that the manga and anime are vastly different.

I would think that just splitting the two up would be easier for people to manage and would stop the repititious nature of "In the anime" and "In the manga" on a lot of the articles Creeperman129 (talk) 01:32, August 29, 2018 (UTC)

It's still gotta be discussed first with the admin being involved in it. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:44, August 29, 2018 (UTC)

Ah, alright. Who should I talk to about it then? Creeperman129 (talk) 01:45, August 29, 2018 (UTC)

You already did on the manual of style talk page. Just wait for one of them to reply first. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:47, August 29, 2018 (UTC)

Alrighty. Thanks. Creeperman129 (talk) 01:51, August 29, 2018 (UTC)

Recent Edit Change

I watched the subbed episode prior to my edit. Was my edit for Super Saiyan 4 Vegeta inaccurate in some way?Firestorm808 (talk) 06:30, August 31, 2018 (UTC)


i wish you stop changing the name repeating of super saiyan blue shinka page, already!!! Nikon23 21:59, September 8, 2018 (UTC)

I didn't, LeonGjata did. Get your facts right first before jumping to conclusions. DragonEmeperor (talk) 22:15, September 8, 2018 (UTC)

You need to CTFD, sister.Rogeta234 (talk) 22:40, September 8, 2018 (UTC)

My better edit on Hit's trivia.

Don't revert my better edit on Hit's trivia again or else I am reporting you.

LokeTheBrave (talk) 22:04, September 11, 2018 (UTC)

Neff said it counts. Read his talk. DragonEmeperor (talk) 22:05, September 11, 2018 (UTC)

Will you read my reasonable edit? It does NOT count. It only counts if you include 'Xenoverse 2' in which case you don't. If you don't believe me then seek out Geekdom101 who most likely knows more about Dragon Ball than any of you here. He has said that the video games don't count and that they are their own separate continuity. If you don't believe him then you are very misinformed. LokeTheBrave (talk) 22:29, September 11, 2018 (UTC)

Well, Geekdom101 isn't up here. We have our own rules and ways of doing things on here. DragonEmeperor (talk) 22:34, September 11, 2018 (UTC)

I don't care if Geekdom101 isn't here. He knows more than you do.  You are wrong in this situation. Just accept your loss.

LokeTheBrave (talk) 22:46, September 11, 2018 (UTC)

Just because you say your edit is better doesn't make it true. You don't know what a franchise is, so any argument you present is immediately and inexorably wrong. A franchise includes all the licensed media. You are wrong. Accept your wrongness and learn.

Orion (T-B-C) 22:50, September 11, 2018 (UTC)

Loke, only the user is allowed to remove messages from their talk. What your doing is vandalism. DragonEmeperor (talk) 00:12, September 12, 2018 (UTC)

This should be addressed

Look, DragonEmeperor, I don't have bad faith in you, but I feel that this problem should be addressed immediately. Lately you have marked a lot of article redirections to delete, the probleme comes to be when you are selecting redirections of valid alternative names, for example, the redirection "Majin Boo" should not be erased, "Cumber" either, to the like of many other examples I can put, but I don't because the list would be very extensive. Please, stop this and limit yourself when it comes to redirections.

Greetings. ~ Yon ~Great King Cold SDBH World Mission artworkVisit my talk page! 02:44, September 12, 2018 (UTC)

I only delete redirects that are misspelled, kanji, or anything that's made up. Anything that was sourced I don't since Neff told me to leave the official ones alone. But, I understand where your coming from though. DragonEmeperor (talk) 02:55, September 12, 2018 (UTC)

You're not allowed to delete other people's edits on your own page

I don't know who you think you are but you're not allowed to go around deleting other people's edits on your talk page regardless if it is your own. I had gotten in trouble for doing that before and if you continue, you will too. So my advice to you, knock it off while you still can.

LokeTheBrave (talk) 04:03, September 12, 2018 (UTC)


Remember me? Well the FighterZ wikia is coming along nicely, if slowly. It think we finally have a character page that looks something like we hoped for. Feel free to check it out!

Also, thanks for all the help you've given me, I apologize for getting mad at you for any of your edits. That's all really. Check it out if you are interested. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 17:19, September 12, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

Also holy crap I can't believe this LokeTheBrave guy is a real human being. He is literally inciting the words of a youtuber as complete and absolute fact. I'm not getting in the argument, I just saw what he did and it is physically painful for me to watch him argue that he is right. He probably worships Geekdom as a god. "You are misinformed if you disagree with this Youtuber" lmao this is golden. Anyways. Just a laugh. —This unsigned comment was made by DeletedTheEngie (talkcontribs) Please sign your posts with ~~~~ next time!


I just gotta know, but what do you have against redirects? A redirect is useful especially if users on the site or visitors are unaware of the dub name or the name in general of a character.--Made up Character Wiki/Dragon Ball Fanon Wiki Admin Jack Jackson Things I do [mod] 07:32, September 16, 2018 (UTC)

Only the made up ones I list for deletion. DragonEmeperor (talk) 08:07, September 16, 2018 (UTC)

Image Sizes

Uh, on this page, is there a way I can make all the images uploaded uniform and resized in line with each other? I'm not really sure how. Any help would be appreciated. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 18:23, September 17, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

Thank you so much for taking the time to fix that page. May I ask how you did it? I'm going to need to do it on my own considering that's just one of 30 pages. DeletedTheEngie (talk) 16:36, September 18, 2018 (UTC)DeletedTheEngie

Just add |thumb|left to each picture. DragonEmeperor (talk) 18:35, September 18, 2018 (UTC)

Sorry about the paragraphs

They automatically do that, I don't even click on those.Invader Rob II (talk) 02:20, September 20, 2018 (UTC)

Template Fonts

Do not revert an edit such as template:PTO unless necessary. Some templates are not legible due to the font color and the background both being dark; would have to change the font color to a bright white to keep a purple background. - Zarbon by raykugen-d2ygchz PrinceZarbon talk contribZarbon ava3 18:07, September 22, 2018 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.