Oops, not really the Daizenshuu, but from some other promotional material.
06:26, August 30, 2016 (UTC)
I was bein sarcastic about removin da XV 'n XV2 games cuz u were bein picky fer some reason. So why da ya want the sections gone from the Other stories section? We include every original story in the section, as ya can clearly see from da other pages which have da section.--Neffyarious (talk) 16:38, November 19, 2016 (UTC)
If other pages have, then they must be removed. If you want to tell every single story of games, then create a page for this. Bardock is not a video-game character, therefore listing every single story of games is pointless and unnecessary. There are too many games listed in there, and only Dragon Ball Online is obviously the one to be kept. Bargeta (talk) 17:15, November 19, 2016 (UTC)
It aint pointless, cuz Baddack did appear an have a role in dose games stories, dats like sayin we should remove movies from Goku cuz he's not a movie character and therefore listing every single movie is pointless and unnecessary, so we should either remove em or make a whole nother page. Also, wat makes DBO so special dat its da only one dat should "obviously" be kept?--Neffyarious (talk) 17:45, November 19, 2016 (UTC)
God Final Flash
I'm almost 100% sure it could be put down as being used in the anime episode 57
yet you undid my edits. may I ask why is this??
Because it is not God Final Flash, it is a regular Final Flash. Bargeta (talk) 19:57, December 3, 2016 (UTC)
Why change my edits? I mean, that sure looks like a Super Saiyan 2 to me. The hair, the sparks. I truly think that was SSJ2.
What you think is not a point, there has been no mention of it being Super Saiyan 2. Akira Toriyama said Goku Black has a Super Saiyan as a transformation (and a slightly different Super Saiyan, referring to Super Saiyan Rosé). Nothing more than that. The presence of sparks mean little (as Bardock and Vegeto also had sparks for some time when they first transformed), and his hair is that of a Super Saiyan for most panels of the manga. Bargeta (talk) 21:28, December 22, 2016 (UTC)
Use talk... Not that it should be necessary cause it has already been discussed.
Ya know in most video games (lowest level of canon on our canon tier) characters can fuze in their base states and end up as a Supe Saiyajin right? Also in Raging Blast 2 base Son Goku and base Bejita can fuse to make Supa Saiyajin Gogeta. I guess that means Super Saiyan Gogeta is not actually a Supa Saiyajin right lol?--Neffyarious (talk) 06:00, January 16, 2017 (UTC)
Go read the article talk page
Go read the article talk page to Super Saiyan Blue and have you not read the manga for DBS lately, because from what I hear it has stated in the it that SSR and SSB are the same form with some differences like the name, eye, hair, and aura color. So with that then it's alternate names of Super Saiyan God Super Saiyan and Super Saiyan God SS should be listed. Anyways I disputed your whole edit but removed three or two that I agreed with you on so you still should have used the article talk page for Super Saiyan Rosé instead of taking off what I disagreed with you on.
I find you constantly saying that I "usually add false information" and "dont know what I'm talking about" to be harassment. I haven't brought this up before because I am quite tolerant but now your annoying me. I suggest you be more polite in the future, just because you disagree with something I've done does not mean you have to be annoying.--Neffyarious (talk) 15:45, January 20, 2017 (UTC)
You find those sweet words to be a "harassment"? Well, I have bad news for you, because now I see clearly that you are a cancer to this place. The source of its bad reputation is you that have bad interpretation of the series and simple video games. Sorry to say, but it is the truth. But the day this wiki will be a reliable source will come, I have faith in that, but only if you cooperate and step out of the moderation. Bargeta (talk) 15:52, January 20, 2017 (UTC)
I would advise you not to insult users whether they are admins or not. Stop breaking the rules and follow them because you are on the verge of getting temp-banned.
"Sweet words"? what are you talking about you were insulting me Bargeta, and now there you go calling me "cancer" and the source of all of the Dragon Ball wiki's bad reputation. I really don't get your problem with me. You should act calmly, if you see something you disagree with don't undo it and insult the person, undo it and tell them to use talk. I would have complied if you had one that. That is what you should have done. I'm blocking you for continued harassment even after a warning. Maybe when you get back you'll act more politely.--Neffyarious (talk) 16:02, January 20, 2017 (UTC)
Divine Lasso quote
Hi, since you didn't pay attention to what I said to the talk page, I am going to leave you a message here instead. Listen, Goku Black actually said, "Taste my blade." in the anime and in the game. Said by both Masako Nozawa's and Sean Schmmel's version of Goku Black. And it is nessessary because there are a lot of articles that put the quotes in the overview and as a quote by itself. Such as: Heat Dome Attack , Big Bang Attack , Fear Me! , Riot Javelin , and several other techniques I did not mention. Please put the quote in overview or as a quote itself.
Actually you was edit warring on Xenoverse 2 if we go by the rules, which means that the article is supposed to stay as it was before your edit till an overall consensus is reached.
Stop removing large amounts of good content from pages, I've noticed that you keep doing it and never give a reason for removing huge amounts of correct info (not that there would be one to give, considering all da info is official). That is classed as vandalism, so I suggest you stop.--Neffyarious (talk) 04:44, June 27, 2017 (UTC)
Regarding which SSJ4 Bardock (Xeno)
It is true that we still have not got any confirmation about which Bardock got the SSJ4 but if you think about it, it is always Xeno Bardock that is getting new transformations, new desgin...etc. The last time where the orignal Bardock ever got a new uptate was back in JM2. God Mission and SDBH is always about Xeno Bardock. Therefore, I personally believe it is safe to assume it is Xeno Bardock. If you look in the DBH page, other assumptions have been made such as Broly Dark being a playbale character. Broly Dark technically still does not have a card, it is only Xeno Paragus that summons him for 1 turn and if assumptions like this can be made, I don't see any problem with Bardock as well Bardock ssj2 (talk) 02:37, November 6, 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think so, the SS4 Bardock clearly has normal Bardock's boots and red "leg protectors"BH Ouji (talk) 07:09, November 6, 2017 (UTC)
- Well an explaination for that is because they actually re designed Xeno Bardock's design since SDBH2
- The new desgin include Bardock's original red protectors and SDBH have been adding his past forms such as SSJ3 into this desgin as well. Bardock ssj2 (talk) 07:27, November 6, 2017 (UTC)
Read the summary. Bargeta (talk) 20:07, December 13, 2017 (UTC)
No. Otherwise we all would know that by now. All we know is that Xeno Bardock (the one with a different outfit) comes from another dimension. Bargeta (talk) 23:01, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
It is actually a very common logic. Because if everyone here base on the principle of only adding information if they have ways to prove/provide source, then, well... We do not have information that only one Bardock exist, on the contrary, we do have an information that there is one Bardock that came from another dimension. If you happen to find the source saying only one Bardock exists, then okay, go ahead and add it. Until there, there is nothing we can do.
As for the overview, Super Bardock saga only consists on one mission, one that you can easily see it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7nIBjwcLps&feature=youtu.be&t=6m3s and in there, there is no mention about existing one Bardock. It is just a mission where you face Xeno Bardock, Kaioshin of Time and Gine. The dialogues, as you can see, don't mention anything interesting. Bargeta (talk) 18:30, February 6, 2018 (UTC)
Oh it's only one mission? TheDevilsCorpse said it was multiple - with it's story explaining how Bardock ended up facing Frieza and then being enslaved and becoming Masked Saiyan, then the extra mission (the one you provided) showing Bardock: Xeno in his new armor.--Neffyarious (talk) 20:00, February 6, 2018 (UTC)
As you can see in the video, there is only one mission related to "Super Bardock saga", you can see the previous video or the next one, they are not even related to this saga. So everything else is false. Bargeta (talk) 02:15, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
All Heroes Media is Connected
I am not. I am correcting the sentence in the video-game section. Also, you are supposed to prevent edit warring. Do your "job" correct. Bargeta (talk) 19:26, October 26, 2018 (UTC)
Then add the appearance text without messing with the text in the video-game section, little man. Bargeta (talk) 19:58, October 26, 2018 (UTC)
Bargeta: Is it really that hard to keep the Appearance section in when you undo the edit? Also more insults really... You've been blocked like three times in the past, how come you haven't learned?
He added that text in the appearance section while removing my text in the video-game, therefore, he is the one who should do the job to add information without messing with mine. And I have reported this little dude countless time but you ignored all of them. How come you can't do your "job" properly? Bargeta (talk) 20:05, October 26, 2018 (UTC)
I've been blocked for edit warring. I've reported it for edit warring countless times, yet you haven't seen? Yeah, you sure are good at what you are doing (sarcasm, obviously). The only thing I'm aware is that you should either become a better mod or leave it for another more qualified one to be an active mod. Bargeta (talk) 20:15, October 26, 2018 (UTC)
I don't block people for edit warring unless it gets extreme. If I'm so bad, how come none of the other admins has blocked Dragon then? Seems they don't think he's committed a block-worthy offense. --Neffyarious (talk) 20:19, October 26, 2018 (UTC)
Then do your edit without adding unnecessary images. Bargeta (talk) 20:03, November 29, 2018 (UTC)
Those images are from video games and were already there. I already reported you anyway because your just like Rogeta234, always trying to bully into your way. DragonEmeperor (talk) 20:13, November 29, 2018 (UTC)
Those images I added a long time ago. And there is no need for more than one image in the video-game section, one is enough. You undo all my edits and are now trying to make me a villain here? Kid... Stop. You are just making yourself look like a fool at this point. Bargeta (talk) 20:14, November 29, 2018 (UTC)
Me a kid. I tried to tell before that Broly was listed but still adding it. That's the problem with users like you always trying to get your way. Well you see Rogeta anymore. DragonEmeperor (talk) 20:30, November 29, 2018 (UTC)
While I agree with Bargeta regarding being too many images, you guys need to discuss this issue in the article's talk page before continuing this annoying edit war.20:31, November 29, 2018 (UTC)
Yonedge, since you are here. Take a look at this image below
Can you do something about this? Bargeta (talk) 20:37, November 29, 2018 (UTC)
Done, I already issued the last and definitive warning, if he does this again, let me know and I'll block him (not only calling names, but edit warring as well). We gave him way too many opportunities to stop doing this kind of stuff.
It seems he stopped now, but he will return eventually. This guy is always undoing my every edit for no reason (you can see that he does not provide any reason as to undoing in the first place) and soon he will resume undoing my edits again if anyone doesn't do anything about it. Also, like a said, his name calling is extremely severe and he needs to be punished for that. He edit wars just for the sake of edit warring. That has to stop now. Bargeta (talk) 20:54, November 29, 2018 (UTC)
Movies 14 and 15 were under the Bio section due to them part of the main story. Broly is also part of the story is already listed like that on several other pages. DragonEmeperor (talk) 22:36, November 29, 2018 (UTC)
- Both of you are in the wrong because you shouldn't be edit warring for any reason nevermind the name calling. Rather than edit war back and forth for over an over, you have a talk page for that it is the exact reason why it exists.Bullza (talk) 01:12, November 30, 2018 (UTC)
Here We Go Again
Bargeta, what's wrong with that pic from the manga? It shows Bardock battling that unknown alien race. I even moved the picture from Broly to save it, but you still wanna remove it. Why? Give me a good enough reason. DragonEmeperor (talk) 23:45, December 31, 2018 (UTC)
The reason is that there must be one picture per section for clean purposes. You do whatever you want, as long as it contains just one image. You are adding two/three images in the same section and that is not correct. Learn some basic stuff before making edits, and worse, edit warring with me. You shouldn't even be here for that matter.Bargeta (talk) 23:50, December 31, 2018 (UTC)
I'm here because I chose to edit here. Your the one giving attitude to people. I even left you a reason in my edit on how I fixed that section, but you wanna act like you own the page. That's your problem and the reason why you been blocked before. DragonEmeperor (talk) 00:37, January 1, 2019 (UTC)
Alright so I noticed you added this image of Yamoshi (https://dragonball.fandom.com/wiki/Yamoshi?file=Original_2.jpg) I was just wondering where you found it and how you found thank you and good day
Provide an explanation next time when you are removing information in articles because no one is going to know why you removed it and because somebody may not agree with the removal of a piece of information will re add the information as it may be valuable information to consider. You have been warned about this by Neff previously and I also consider that vandalism when information just gets removed out of blue and an explanation is not provided for the removal which was why I had to revert your edits every single time that information got removed. So please stop removing information without providing an explanation even if you don’t believe it to be true because others may think otherwise. (Sosuagwu17 (talk) 06:59, September 7, 2019 (UTC))