The Same Thing!
Android 18 and Future Android 18 are the exact same person from the exact same time period!!! AquaHope 21:05, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
- No they aren't, Future Lazuli was a badass, and had potential to be good (unlike what toy ani may shin thinks), while Lazuli deserved to be turned into scrap metalBH Ouji (talk) 10:36, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
No they're not. I am not even gonna explain why. Too many obvious reasons to post if they were from the same timeline there'd be no Future Trunks and Cell would appear much much later. But obviously Future Trunks does exist and Cell didn't appear until much much later. Lssj4 21:59, May 2, 20
So what you are saying is the show is wrong or that I'm stupid or what? (not being a smart mouth, just asking question so answer to your free will) AquaHope 13:43, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
No. I am saying you're wrong. They are not the same, go watch the show again or read the manga. Future Android 18's personality is different than the main timeline one and the future timeline is one where 18 never had Marron with Krillin therefore that is a clear difference. I am not going to explain any further go watch the History of Trunks special and the entire Android saga. That should sum it up. Lssj4 14:09, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
- The characters in Dragon Ball series and their future counterparts are totally different beings. In an episode, for example, when future Trunks stands talking to the Z Fighters, kid Trunks is still a baby and Bulma holds him in her arms. Another example would be how 17 and 18 destroyed the world in Trunks' timeline, but they were really good fellows in the main timeline. They didn't even kill the Z Fighters. They let Kuririn give them Senzu beans. Yet another example is, Gohan is dead in Trunks' timeline whereas he's alive in the future of the main timeline where the main events take place. Conclusion: A person and their future counterparts are not the same person. - User:Kill You/sig 14:38, May 3, 2011 (UTC)